![]() The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. 2 2001 WI 48 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. Kassel, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. ![]() For the petitioner-appellant the cause was argued by Jeffrey J. Berghahn and Hurley, Burish & Milliken, S.C., Madison, and oral argument by Marcus J. ![]() Dissented: Not Participating: ATTORNEYS: For the respondent-respondent-petitioner there were briefs by Stephen P. 2d 527, 611 N.W.2d 471 (Unpublished) Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument: Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES: Concurred: OctoCircuit Dane Moria Krueger ABRAHAMSON, C.J., concurs (opinion filed). REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 2000 WI App 94 Reported at: 234 Wis. S., a person Under the Age of 17: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Appellant, v. 2001 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-2317 Complete Title of Case: In the Interest of A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |